Alisa Kummel vs Sofia Martianova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 06 Aug at 11:00 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Kummel vs S. Martianova

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Kummel 1 - 0 Martianova
They have played 2 sets in total, with Alisa Kummel winning 2 and Sofia Martianova winning 0. The last match between Alisa Kummel and Sofia Martianova was at the W15 Astana, 06-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Alisa Kummel getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kummel | 1 |
| Martianova | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Astana(08-06-25)
A. Kummel vs S. Martianova H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 55.62% (94-75) | Career Total W/L | 52.94% (36-32) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Kummel vs S. Martianova Match Preview:
- Regarding second serve performance, Kummel has a slight edge, winning 38% of points compared to Martianova's 35.56%.
- In return games, Kummel has outperformed Martianova by winning 54.44% of opponents' second serve points, while Martianova has won 53.27%.
- Martianova holds an advantage in first serve returns, with a success rate of 37.21% against Kummel's 34.89%.
- Kummel saves 50% of breakpoints under pressure, whereas Martianova saves a slightly higher 51.14%.
- Over the past year, Kummel has a 57.45% match win rate, slightly ahead of Martianova's 54%.
- Kummel's strongest surface is Hard courts with a win rate of 59%, contrasting with Martianova's best performance on Clay at 60%.
- Both players frequently compete in Futures/Satellite/ITF $10K events, with Kummel winning 55.17% and Martianova 53.33% of their matches.
- What about experience? Kummel has been facing opponents with an average rank of 375.45, indicating they face less challenging competition compared to Martianova's average opponent rank of 131.48.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Kummel excels, having won 50% of such scenarios compared to Martianova's 47% success rate.
- In breakpoint conversions, Martianova shows superior performance, converting 47.45% of opportunities, whereas Kummel only converts 34.88%.
Editorial Prediction (August 6, 2025, UTC):
Assessing the players' statistics, we see that Kummel shows a stronger service game, particularly in second serves, which might give them an edge in lengthy rallies and tight games.
However, Martianova demonstrates proficiency in first serve returns and breakpoint conversion, which could be crucial in critical points of the match.
When considering opponent quality, Martianova has battled against higher-ranked players, potentially preparing them better for competitive play. In deciding sets, Kummel shows resilience, maintaining a marginally better record.
Considering these elements, Martianova's experience against tougher opposition and superior breakpoint conversion might give them the edge. It appears likely that Martianova will emerge as the victor in the upcoming match.
Alisa Kummel vs Sofia Martianova Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Kummel vs S. Martianova H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:31:23 | Average Match Time | 1:31:23 |
| 70% (53/76) | 1st Serve % | 69% (44/64) |
| 66% (35/53) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (24/44) |
| 48% (11/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 60% (12/20) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Pts Won % | 22% (2/9) |
| 44% (28/64) | Return Points Win % | 39% (30/76) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Kummel Recent Matches Played
S. Martianova Recent Matches Played

A. Kummel vs S. Martianova Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.62% (94/75) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.94% (36/32) |
| 54.86% (209/172) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.90% (82/73) |
| 52.10% (1833/1685) | Games Win/Loss | 52.77% (780/698) |
| 58.65% (78/55) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.91% (28/27) |
| 43.75% (7/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.54% (8/5) |
| 45.00% (9/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 148 | Aces Total | 55 |
| 0.45 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 767 | Total Double Faults | 94 |
| 1:18:37 | Average Match Time | 1:5:17 |
| 375.92 | Average Opponent Rank | 203.9 |
| 63% (5950/9446) | 1st Serve % | 67% (1949/2896) |
| 60% (3547/5950) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (1141/1949) |
| 42% (1483/3496) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (380/947) |
| 50% (644/1291) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (163/323) |
| 48% (4457/9284) | Return Points Win % | 46% (1223/2675) |
| 52.94% (27/24) | Challenger W/L | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 56.78% (67/51) | Futures W/L | 52.38% (33/30) |
| 55% (92/167) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (35/67) |
| 62% (16/26) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (5/12) |
| 49% (22/45) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (9/20) |
| 90% (91/82) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (37/32) |
| 10% (91/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (37/5) |
| 15% (78/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (31/4) |